Pros:
- Good dynamic FPS
- Story is ok
- Relation between mech and it's pilot
- Parkour elements
- Singularity-like level

Cons:
- Dumb enemies
- Easy boss fights

Conclusion:

People complained that TitanFall 1 didn't have single player campaign, so devs created nice short experience to fill this void in sequel. It lasts 6 hours, isn't terribly hard, teaches game basics nicely and has nice graphic. Just don't expect amazing and deep story, as it wasn't point of single player mode. It's still mainly multiplayer game. But interactions between you and mech are entertaining, so it doesn't feel like lame bots shooting range.

Parkour sequences are really Mirror's Edge-like, so fluid and gameplaywise easy to learn. And singularity-like level where I could use gauntlet to move back and forth in time was really well made and funny.

Pros:
- Nice graphic
- Open (albeit small) map
- Parkour is still fun

Cons:
- Game forces player into unavoidable fights
- Story is lame
- Filling and pointless side quests
- Path is not always clear
- Lack of mini-map

Conclusion:

Mirror's Edge Catalyst is not a sequel to Mirror's Edge, but series reboot. And I'm ambivalent about it. Sure, we have open word but it's empty and forcefully filled with pointless side quests (how many times you want to run from point A to point B to deliver package?). There is no mini-map so you can't really plan your movements and you often end cornered in blind alley. There is "runner sight" that marks possible path, but what's fun in having open map if you have to run on computer-generated path or you will get lost easily?

Story is predictable, characters aren't likable. And fact that police just swarms rooftops when you rise alarm is ridiculous. They start to pour from doors like they sat in buildings elevators waiting for signal. Thankfully it's easy to run away from them when we're not in mission, so some fights can be avoided.

Pros:
- Ok graphic
- Combat system is better than in Mars: War Logs
- Clear and easy to use interface

Cons:
- If you say mimic is bad in ME: Andromeda don't think about playing in it xD
- Average plot
- Semi-open empty maps
- Crewmates with personality of a flatworm
- No respec option

Conclusion:

Technomancer is succesor to Mars: War Logs. But combat is not as stiff (some may find if enjoyable) and maps are little bigger. This game explains things from technomancers point of view, so if you liked game universe after beating Mars: WL you will enjoy learning new bits of info. But main story is as much generic as possible, we met with arch enemy in first minutes of gameplay, and need to kill him throuhg rest of the game. Side quest are typical fetch quests, squadmates are unlikable. I liked Mary in previous game, so I though they will have at least one good written character. Instead it's straight "make my quest and we'll bank, ok?" romance.

If I'd rate it in "cheap AA RPG" category it would get 4 stars. As it's way better than Mars: WL and I saw worse RPGs. But there is no such category, so it will have to be happy with 3 stars

Pros:
- It's Saint's Row 4 v2

Cons:
- It's Saint's Row 4 v2

Conclusion:

Why pros and cons are the same? Because if you liked SR:4 and want more you will like it. If you're fed up with SR:4 don't even start this game

Average story with super repetitive gameplay (exactly the same as in SR:3 and SR:4, but in Gat out of Hell you can fly with wings). Devs give us the same activities from SR:3 and SR:4, plus change how powers look like from SR:4 (tho they're still the same powers)

I liked fly mechanism, so I went and grabbed few extra achievements. But nothing will force me to start this game again >_> So I know why I got this game for free from a friend - they wanted make me suffer for all this time I annoyed them >:D

Pros:
- Solid and not predictable story
- Our stats influence dialogue options we can choose
- Less decking plus it is totally redesigned - more stealthy than with turn-based combat
- Quest rewards are tied to our choices

Cons:
- Starts really slowly
- There were times when I had to turn it off, as it felt like Visual Novel, not RPG
- I liked companions from DragonFall more

Conclusion:

Hong Kong feels like nicely refined DragonFall. We still get good story, ability to beat level like Rambo or in stealth way, statistics that influence our dialogues with NPCs. DragonFall has way too much decking, it felt like only viable way to play it was mix of decker and fight class. In pretty much every single level I had to hack something and then fight in cyberspace. Looks like it was also devs impression, so decking in Hong Kong is completely redesigned - 1st of all it's not as abundant, 2nd of all it's more like sneak minigame than constant fight. Apart from swords and fists we can use cyber weapons - claws etc.

But not everything is perfect and Hong Kong suffers from the same thing two previous games - walls of text. After beating 3 Shadowrun games already it feels like it's series motive, just like stats that influence dialogues. But it makes game really slow paced at the beginning, and hard to really sunk into the story. Plus it felt like kinetic visual novel at times, so I had to alt+tab it and do something else like write stuff on discord or talk with someone on steam >_>. Also 1 or 2 achievements didn't unlock peoperly.